New Yorker: "Even in a state that has long been considered, by those who keep track of such things, one of the worst in the country when it comes to election administration—the basic civic business of collecting and counting votes—New York City stands out.
...On Wednesday morning, advocates of election reform held a conference call with reporters to emphasize that the board’s error wasn’t related to ranked-choice voting. “The discrepancy was due to human error, not any problem with the scanners, or the ranked-choice voting technology—this was a mistake by a low-level junior staffer,” Susan Lerner, the executive director of the New York chapter of Common Cause, an advocacy group, said...” (A Board of Elections spokesperson later confirmed to me that a junior staff member in Queens had forgotten to hit “clear” in the vote-counting software.)
...Lerner and other reformers have advocated for taking control of the board out of the hands of party officials, and professionalizing the system by hiring nonpartisan election administrators. But lawmakers in both Albany and New York City have largely ignored these calls... Stu Loeser, who served as Michael Bloomberg’s spokesperson when he attempted to push such reforms as mayor, compared incumbent lawmakers’ resistance to election reform to the N.R.A.’s opposition to gun-control laws.