Brennan Center. "What can states do to protect elections amid reduced federal support?...Regardless of what happens next, states — which actually run our elections — and civil society will need to step up to fill the gaps the federal government has left. “

Comment:  In the current  environment of security threats without the protections that the federal government previously provided, it is even more urgent that New York legislators pass the Voting Integrity and Verification Act of NY (VIVANY A6287/S7116) to protect our existing system of hand marked paper ballots and scanners.  With hand marked paper ballots we have something to audit and verify the vote count if the voting computers break down or are hacked.  ALLEGRA DENGLER

Zetter: "The security of the nation's election systems has long been in question – a number of security investigations and reports going back two decades have found significant and numerous security flaws with voting machines used by jurisdictions around the country. But many of the claims made during the 2020 presidential campaign went beyond facts about security risks to state categorically without evidence that the systems had been subverted to give Biden the election. Trump and his followers had also asserted that massive voter fraud had helped Biden win the election, but the claims were not supported by evidence."

New York Times: "Federal programs that monitored foreign influence and disinformation have been eliminated. Key elements of the warning systems intended to flag possible intrusions into voting software have also been degraded... And contractors who worked with local election officials to perform cybersecurity testing, usually with federal funding, have found the deals canceled....“It’s like somebody lowered the drawbridge, and there’s no guards,” said Adrian Fontes, the Democratic secretary of state in Arizona.... “This is incredibly bad.”

APNews: "Forcing states to change, the suit says, would violate the broad authority the Constitution gives states to set their own election rules. It says they decide the “times, places and manner” of how elections are run.”

“This decision effectively treats the right to vote as merely the right to cast a ballot, not the right to know what vote is being cast and counted,” said Marks. “That cannot be the law. A system where a voter has no way to know whether their ballot reflects their true selections is fundamentally incompatible with the constitutional right to vote… Despite the dismissal, the Court credited Plaintiffs’ advocacy with prompting recent legislative reforms, including Georgia’s enactment of a new law to eliminate QR code-based vote tabulation by 2026.”

While you are writing your lawmakers, add that you support the Voting Integrity and Verification Act of NY (VIVANY)  A6287 / S7116 and the Count Every Vote Act of NY (CEVA)  S471)/A4307.

The Voting Integrity and Verification Act of NY (VIVANY)  A6287 / S7116  protects our right to vote on hand marked paper ballots which is under threat

The Count Every Vote Act of NY (CEVA):   S471)/A4307 precisely defines the margin of victory for the purpose of triggering a hand recount of ballots.

Lawsuit filed by Coalition for Good Governance, an organization that bills itself as supporting “election integrity and election security,” against Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger (R) challenging the use of electronic voting machines in Georgia. The plaintiff alleges that the use of Direct Recording Equipment (DRE) voting equipment violates the fundamental right to vote by failing to protect against the threat of intrusion and manipulation by failing to “provide a reasonable and adequate method for voting by which Georgia electors’ votes would be accurately counted” because DRE ballots are “counted electronically and cannot reliably prevent or detect errors.” The plaintiff requests a judgment stating that the use of electronic voting machines violates the Georgia Constitution, 14th Amendment and Georgia election law and requests the prohibition of the DRE system. 

The greatest threat to Donald Trump’s authoritarian dream is not the courts — it is free and fair elections. While the courts can stand in the way of his twisted vision for America, they can never completely halt it. Trump knows this. Trump operates on the assumption that there will be no political check on his power. His plan to subvert democracy depends on the subservience of a Republican-controlled Congress. His worst nightmare is a scenario in which Democrats flip one or both chambers in 2026.

No joke. On Tuesday, President Donald J. Trump issued an extraordinary Executive Order that would give “the DOGE Administrator,” that is, Elon Musk, access to the voter files of every state for the purpose of purging millions of Americans from voter rolls as suspected “non-citizens.”

Billionaire Elon Musk's unprecedented efforts to bolster the conservative candidate in next week's hotly contested Wisconsin Supreme Court race ran into legal hot water Friday amid accusations that he had broken state election law.

The Trump administration continues to push us toward a constitutional crisis, leaving our democracy at a breaking point. President Donald Trump signed an executive order attempting to tighten rules for U.S. elections and threatened funding cuts to states that do not comply. The order will be challenged in court by voting rights groups.

From Ray Lutz:

I have a number of new data analyses to present in upcoming editions on this channel, but first, I want to build a foundation of the full range of scams that are possible, which ones are truly illegal, and which ones are not illegal but bad nevertheless.

"The changes at CISA unravel a long-established partnership between the federal government and the states, which have long relied on the agency to help secure their electronic and physical infrastructure.
Election officials say the EI-ISAC, which was established in 2018 during Trump’s first term following an investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election, will not be easy to replace..”

Slate:  “...the acting director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency sent a memo to all agency staff notifying them that “all election security activities” would be paused pending the results of an internal investigation. The memo also stated that the administration was cutting off all funds to the Election Infrastructure Information Sharing and Analysis Center—a Department of Homeland Security–funded organization that helps state and local officials monitor, analyze, and respond to cyberattacks targeting the nation’s election hardware and software."

The Republican plan is to win next year’s election this year. Yes, the voting will be bent, jacked and hammered this year, 2025, one year before the official voting. Because this is the year of The Great Purge.

And if The Great Purge doesn’t do the trick, Republicans are ramping up other vote suppression tactics they rolled out to win 2024, including a private army of MAGA-nauts who challenged over a million voters’ ballots in 2024 and plan on way more by the 2026 midterm.

Suffolk County is moving forward with the 34 million dollar purchase of ExpressVote XL voting machines despite the fact that there has been no competitive bidding process as they promised there would be. 

The vote is Tuesday. Please call Suffolk County and urge them to vote no on Appropriations 1026. The general number is 631-853-4070.

NYTimes:  "Experts are alarmed that the cuts could leave the United States defenseless against covert foreign influence operations and embolden foreign adversaries seeking to disrupt democratic governments."

Stateline: "“The administration is shuttering the FBI’s Foreign Influence Task Force and last week cut more than 100 positions at the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency…"Trump is making it easier for foreign adversaries to attack our elections and our democracy,” Griswold said in an interview. “He incites all this violence, he has attacked our election system, and now he is using the federal government to weaken us.””

APNews: "The actions send a message that securing U.S. elections against interference from countries such as Russia, China and Iran is no longer a federal government priority, said Larry Norden, an election expert with the Brennan Center for Justice.“I think we would be naive to think that the bad guys don’t get that message, too, that there’s going to be less of a cop on the beat to protect our elections,” he said.”

The Hartmann Report: “.. since the Dobbs decision striking down Roe v Wade protections for women’s right to abortion ..., the blowback against Republicans by women has concerned the party’s elders.,,In response, they’ve put forward the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act which would specifically outlaw voter registration by an estimated third (and perhaps two-thirds) of all American women...every  married woman in America who’s taken her husband’s name without going through a formal court process to legalize the name change, will have to go through that cumbersome and expensive process to get a certificate that will allow her to vote. And living in a Blue state won’t help; this is federal legislation….The Republican assault on women's voting rights isn’t just a threat — it’s already underway. Stand up, speak out, and fight back: call your representatives, rally your community, and make sure they know we will not allow women’s voices or votes to be erased."